Lawyers for Alex Jones turned over evidence that contradicted his testimony

After years of telling his followers the Sandy Hook school shooting was staged, Jones admitted on the stand that the massacre was real. He is being sued in Austin by parents of one of the shooting’s victims.

Alex Jones speaks with the media Tuesday following the end of that day’s testimony in his defamation trial in Austin.

Conspiracy Philosopher and media personality Alex Jones was brazened with several pieces of substantiation Wednesday that contradicted his own evidence during his vilification trial, where the parents of a 6- time-old killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary firing are suing him after he claimed the butchery was offered. 

The exposures including textbook dispatches and emails Jones ’ attorneys supposedly transferred to opposing counsel by accident — came on the final day of evidence in the portion of the trial in which jurors will determine what damages, if any, Jones owes the parents of Jesse Lewis. 

Jones witnessed Tuesday that he noway mentioned Sandy Hook in textbook dispatches, so he noway handed similar records as needed during the trial’s discovery process. But Mark Bankston, an attorney for Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, told Jones on Wednesday that Jones ’ own attorneys lately accidentally transferred them the contents of Jones ’ phone from the last two times. 

Bankston also refocused out several textbooks and other substantiation that contradicted Jones ’ former evidence and said he'd several of Jones ’ textbook dispatches that mentioned Sandy Hook. He'd Jones read one to confirm. 

At first, Jones tried to say that the actuality of the textbooks demonstrated he duly handed them, indeed though his attorneys transferred them after discovery. 

“ I ’m not a tech joe. I told you in my evidence, I gave my phone to the attorneys, ” Jones said. 

Heslin and Lewis are suing Jones for$ 150 million for telling listeners of his Austin- grounded website and broadcast Infowars that the nation’s alternate deadliest academy firing — in which 20 children periods 6 and 7 and six grown-ups were killed — was a government humbug meant to take down Americans ’ ordnance. That led his listeners to kill the victims ’ families. 

An Austin judge preliminarily ordered a dereliction judgment against Jones for vilification. It’s one of numerous vilification suits filed by families of Sandy Hook shooting victims that Jones has lost. 

During his questioning, Jones ’ counselF. Andino Reynal asked if he understood how “ absolutely reckless ” it was for him to claim that the Sandy Hook shooting noway happed and that no bone actually failed. 

“ It was, ” Jones replied. “ Especially since I ’ve met the parents. It’s 100 real. ” 

Before in his evidence, Jones said he'd tête-à-tête searched for “ Sandy Hook ” in his textbook dispatches and had set up no dispatches. He also witnessed that he doesn't have a particular dispatch and would thus have no dispatch history of talking about Sandy Hook. 

Bankston revealed that the contents of Jones ’ phone suggested else. In response, Jones said he occasionally dictates emails to his adjunct, which he doesn't count as tête-à-tête writing or transferring emails. He also put the onus on his IT platoon to have transferred over any emails about Sandy Hook. 

“ I tête-à-tête don't get on the internet and sit there and use dispatch, ” Jones said. “ I noway shoot emails myself because I do n’t like it, I ca n’t stand it. That’s a fact, that I do n’t use dispatch. ” 

Jones witnessed that he lost millions of bones after deplatforming. In 2018, Jones and Infowars were banned by YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Apple for violating those platforms ’ detest speech programs. Bankston said the contents of Jones ’ phone showed that his profit actually rose. Some days, Infowars garnered further than$,000 per day. Jones said that high figure was a result of his show’s programming about the Conservative Political Action Conference. 

During the rest of his evidence, Jones constantly portrayed himself as a victim. He said his identity was “ stolen ” and he was made into a “ monster ” by mainstream media after talking about the Sandy Hook shooting on Infowars. He criticized commercial media for misportraying him and his commentary and complained that Hilary Clinton’s presidential crusade targeted him for portraying the abecedarian academy firing as a humbug. He also said his notorious interview with Megyn Kelly in 2017 was overedited and misrepresented his views. 

Jones said if he could change the history, he'd have chosen not to state his content of Sandy Hook because of how it ruined his life and career — without citing how it affected the lives of the Sandy Hook parents. 

During closing arguments, one of the parents ’ attorneys, Kyle Farrar, told jurors that they've a chance to hold Jones responsible for the detriment his conduct and words caused. 

“ This is a decade of falsehoods, a decade of dishonesty that destroyed people’s lives, ” Farrar said. “ He’s made( Heslin and Lewis) live their lives in fear, in fear of being harmed or boggled by people who believed the falsehoods and wanted to do commodity about it. ” 

Jurors began reflections late Wednesday autumn and were anticipated to continue considering evidence and substantiation Thursday.